←back to thread

193 points bilsbie | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
jmathai ◴[] No.46000348[source]
I do think Covid forced people to ask questions they hadn’t before.

We have sent our kids to private, poor quality and top rated schools.

We saw a stark difference between the poor quality and higher cost options. No surprise.

But the reason we are considering home schooling our younger kids was surprising. It says something about a system dedicated to teaching children when parents think they can do as well or better.

That’s just education. The social situation in schools is ludicrous. Phones, social media, etc. what a terrible environment we adults have created for kids to learn both educationally and socially.

Home schooling has answers for ALL of that.

replies(12): >>46000393 #>>46000409 #>>46000478 #>>46000487 #>>46000848 #>>46001520 #>>46003678 #>>46007513 #>>46008078 #>>46008322 #>>46008468 #>>46008837 #
rich_sasha ◴[] No.46001520[source]
I suppose there are few talented, hard working people who want to teach, and they command a premium. Education is expensive and underfunded.

As a parent/carer you probably are much more motivated than an underpaid teacher who wanted to do something else anyway, and you don't have to motivate yourself with money.

By extension, IME, motivated and talented teachers in any school (good or bad) can do wonders. There just aren't that many. And as you say, school environment tends to be a race to the bottom - if Johnny can watch Tiktok during maths, I'll do the same.

replies(3): >>46007623 #>>46007760 #>>46008984 #
rahimnathwani ◴[] No.46007623[source]

  Education is expensive and underfunded.
Expensive yes. Underfunded depends on where you are.

San Francisco's school district has an annual operating budget that equates to $28k per student.

I've heard people in San Francisco say that schools here are underfunded. When I ask them how much we spend per student per year, their guess is usually less than half of the actual amount.

replies(3): >>46007686 #>>46008218 #>>46008959 #
triceratops ◴[] No.46007686[source]
$28k doesn't go as far in San Francisco because of the insane cost of housing and everything else.
replies(3): >>46007737 #>>46007876 #>>46008035 #
bluecalm ◴[] No.46007876[source]
If an average class has 20 students it's $560k per year. If an average student gets 1000 hours of schooling per year you can pay 200$/hour and you have spent only just above 1/3 of your budget.

It feels like there is more to the story that "$28k doesn't go as far in San Francisco".

replies(3): >>46007952 #>>46007985 #>>46008262 #
a2tech ◴[] No.46008262[source]
It’s because this is a very simplified view of a classroom. What is presented above is the best case scenario, not a realistic one. For example, there’s no consideration of costs associated with any sort of handicapped student, or student with special education needs.

Real world costs completely spiral out of control when you look at the actual system—for example, the buildings are all built during the rapid expansion of the country so are now old enough to need expensive maintenance, and there isn’t money or interest from the community to tear them down and build new ones.

Also something else that isn’t being covered is that involved parents are pulling their kids out for home schooling, and well behaved kids are increasingly being pulled out and put in charter sschools. This is leading to a rapid collapse of the school system. Public school is being left as a place for students who’s parents don’t care enough to do anything with them, or with enough behavioral or special needs that charter schools won’t handle them.

replies(2): >>46008577 #>>46008749 #
1. michaelt ◴[] No.46008577[source]
> the buildings are all built during the rapid expansion of the country so are now old enough to need expensive maintenance

What kind of maintenance do you think is expensive compared to a budget of $560k per room, per year?