←back to thread

193 points bilsbie | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.211s | source
Show context
jmathai ◴[] No.46000348[source]
I do think Covid forced people to ask questions they hadn’t before.

We have sent our kids to private, poor quality and top rated schools.

We saw a stark difference between the poor quality and higher cost options. No surprise.

But the reason we are considering home schooling our younger kids was surprising. It says something about a system dedicated to teaching children when parents think they can do as well or better.

That’s just education. The social situation in schools is ludicrous. Phones, social media, etc. what a terrible environment we adults have created for kids to learn both educationally and socially.

Home schooling has answers for ALL of that.

replies(12): >>46000393 #>>46000409 #>>46000478 #>>46000487 #>>46000848 #>>46001520 #>>46003678 #>>46007513 #>>46008078 #>>46008322 #>>46008468 #>>46008837 #
aidenn0 ◴[] No.46000393[source]
> But the reason we are considering home schooling our younger kids was surprising. It says something about a system dedicated to teaching children when parents think they can do as well or better.

What's the reason?

replies(1): >>46000429 #
jmathai ◴[] No.46000429[source]
I think we could teach them as well as the school does. And more importantly, we can provide a better environment for them to mature socially.
replies(3): >>46000480 #>>46003115 #>>46007493 #
standardUser ◴[] No.46007493[source]
That's probably true in a lot of cases for K-5. But I don't think any two people could teach a child with the same robustness as a the ~15 teachers most kids have during middle school/junior high, let alone provide things like labs, workshops, extracurriculars, etc. With high school that gap goes from big to enormous.
replies(3): >>46007553 #>>46007824 #>>46010457 #
1. ◴[] No.46007553[source]