←back to thread

361 points mseri | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.401s | source
Show context
stavros ◴[] No.46002252[source]
> the best fully open 32B-scale thinking model

It's absolutely fantastic that they're releasing an actually OSS model, but isn't "the best fully open" a bit of a low bar? I'm not aware of any other fully open models.

replies(9): >>46002293 #>>46002338 #>>46002597 #>>46002842 #>>46002944 #>>46003313 #>>46004177 #>>46006028 #>>46006176 #
1. comp_raccoon ◴[] No.46006028[source]
Olmo author here… would be nice to have some more competition!! I don’t like that we are so lonely either.

We are competitive with open weights models in general, just a couple points behind best Qwen.

Fully open models are important for research community; a lot of fundamental discoveries are made when you have access to training data. We call out we are the best fully open model because researchers would want to know about that.

replies(1): >>46006051 #
2. stavros ◴[] No.46006051[source]
Makes sense, thanks!