←back to thread

361 points mseri | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.209s | source
Show context
Y_Y ◴[] No.46002975[source]
I asked it if giraffes were kosher to eat and it told me:

> Giraffes are not kosher because they do not chew their cud, even though they have split hooves. Both requirements must be satisfied for an animal to be permissible.

HN will have removed the extraneous emojis.

This is at odds with my interpretation of giraffe anatomy and behaviour and of Talmudic law.

Luckily old sycophant GPT5.1 agrees with me:

> Yes. They have split hooves and chew cud, so they meet the anatomical criteria. Ritual slaughter is technically feasible though impractical.

replies(3): >>46004171 #>>46005088 #>>46006063 #
embedding-shape ◴[] No.46004171[source]
How many times did you retry (so it's not just up to chance), what were the parameters, specifically for temperature and top_p?
replies(2): >>46005252 #>>46005308 #
1. Y_Y ◴[] No.46005308[source]
Sorry I lost the chat, but it was default parameters on the 32B model. It cited some books saying that they had three stomachs and didn't ruminate, but after I pressed on these points it admitted that it left out the fourth stomach because it was small, and claimed that the rumination wasn't "true" in some sense.