←back to thread

361 points mseri | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
stavros ◴[] No.46002252[source]
> the best fully open 32B-scale thinking model

It's absolutely fantastic that they're releasing an actually OSS model, but isn't "the best fully open" a bit of a low bar? I'm not aware of any other fully open models.

replies(9): >>46002293 #>>46002338 #>>46002597 #>>46002842 #>>46002944 #>>46003313 #>>46004177 #>>46006028 #>>46006176 #
1. maxloh ◴[] No.46002944[source]
AFSIK, when they use the term "fully open", they mean open dataset and open training code. The Olmo series of models are the only mainstream models out there that satisfy this requirement, hence the clause.

> We go beyond just releasing model weights - we provide our training code, training data, our model weights, and our recipes.

https://docs.allenai.org/#truly-open

replies(1): >>46003698 #
2. stavros ◴[] No.46003698[source]
Yes, and that's why saying this is "the best" is a tautology. If it's the only one, it's obviously the best, and the worst, and everything.