←back to thread

A graph explorer of the Epstein emails

(epstein-doc-explorer-1.onrender.com)
322 points cratermoon | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.204s | source
Show context
theultdev ◴[] No.45958255[source]
This is the best rendition I've seen so far.

The Bill Clinton entity is interesting.

> 2009: Bill Clinton discontinued association with Jeffrey Epstein

> 2010: Jeffrey Epstein provided flights on jets to Bill Clinton

> 2010-2011: Jeffrey Epstein traveled via private aircraft with Bill Clinton

> 2011: Ghislaine Maxwell piloted helicopter for Bill Clinton

> 2014: Bill Clinton alleged presence at sex parties

> 2015: Bill Clinton distanced relationship from Jeffrey Epstein

Wasn't very good at discontinuing the relationship it seems.

Guess there is precedent for him lying about sexual activities though.

I think a sentiment analysis between the friendliness and social meetups between Epstein and other individuals would be useful.

Who were his friends after 2008 when he was first convicted?

Those who were still friends with him after 2008 were in on it or guilty by association, if not legally, socially.

Friends like Reid Hoffman and Larry Summers...

> From: Reid Hoffman

> Sent: 7/6/2015 5:04:31 PM

> To: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com]

> Subject: RE: ICYMI

> slow progress.

> planning to see you in August.

> Hope you're well.

Larry Summers has too many to list. Doesn't look good though digging through them.

replies(4): >>45958665 #>>45958729 #>>45960299 #>>45961332 #
tinyplanets[dead post] ◴[] No.45958665[source]
[flagged]
theultdev ◴[] No.45958685[source]
Of course, deflect discussion to Trump. Does that make any of those other people look better to you?

Trump gave information against Epstein in 2009 and unlike Bill and others did cut ties after learning he was poaching girls from Mar-a-Lago.

I specifically made the point to look into those who were friends with Epstein even after knowing what he was doing.

Nice whataboutism though. Feel free to reference source materials to support your claims.

Btw are you a bot or is that just a canned statement you use?

replies(6): >>45958762 #>>45959420 #>>45959542 #>>45959604 #>>45960309 #>>45960472 #
hiccuphippo ◴[] No.45959604[source]
Well for one those other people are not the current president of the most powerful country in the world.

But sure, lock all of them up, just don't ignore a few because they are too powerful.

replies(2): >>45960107 #>>45960717 #
JumpCrisscross ◴[] No.45960107[source]
It’s been wild to see people subsume not defending child rapists to their partisan identity.

I’m still convinced it’s a minority of loud voices online and on social media.

replies(1): >>45961988 #
rayiner[dead post] ◴[] No.45961988[source]
[flagged]
1. JumpCrisscross ◴[] No.45967633[source]
> what fundamentally differentiates people who simply don’t like Trump for all the legitimate reasons to dislike Trump from the people who go full blown Rachel Maddow is deep-seated liberal universalism

You should know this isn’t me.

I was honestly optimistic for this Presidency. The corruption and lawlessness were annoying. But the masked ICE agents openly defying the law struck a nerve. And now we’re seeing folks like Megyn Kelly advocate for dismissing child rape.

That Trump is acting guilty, and has taken this from a fringe conspiracy theory to something worth considering, is almost besides the point. My condemnation is of the partisan dismissal of the crime per se, not Trump’s involvement.

replies(1): >>45969938 #
2. rayiner ◴[] No.45969938[source]
> But the masked ICE agents openly defying the law struck a nerve.

The ICE agents are masked because people think they can violently interfere with federal law enforcement. People voted for the guy that promised mass deportations, and the government is entitled to carry out that policy and respond to violent resistance to those operations.

Nobody is “dismissing” Epstein’s crimes. Megyn is reacting to people trying to smear Trump as a “child rapist” and “pedophile” based on zero evidence.

replies(2): >>45971317 #>>45975943 #
3. JumpCrisscross ◴[] No.45971317[source]
> ICE agents are masked because people think they can violently interfere with federal law enforcement

Not a problem for all other law enforcement. The precedent being set--that masked men can disappear people from the street--is dangerous and un-American.

> People voted for the guy that promised mass deportations, and the government is entitled to carry out that policy and respond to violent resistance to those operations

Sure. None of this requires a mask.

Also, the only injuries ICE officers have suffered have been due to e.g. being dragged by a car [1]. None have been due to someone tracking them down ex post facto.

> Megyn is reacting to people trying to smear Trump as a “child rapist” and “pedophile” based on zero evidence

She argued Jeffrey Epstein is not technically a pedophile. (A defense she similarly mounts with zero evidence.) She described a 15-year old as "barely legal," which is nonsense and disgusting and deeply unsettling given she literally has a daughter around that age.

And until now, Trump has been going out of his way to block the government from fulfilling his campaign promise around the Epstein files. (After his AG lied that they don't exist.) As a result, it took Democrats in the Congress releasing the e-mails to get Larry Summers to step down [2].

[1] https://www.dhs.gov/news/2025/09/12/dhs-statement-ice-office...

[2] https://apnews.com/article/larry-summers-jeffrey-epstein-ema...

4. throwaway290 ◴[] No.45975943[source]
> The ICE agents are masked because people think they can violently interfere with federal law enforcement

Actually it is wearing masks interferes with legal law enforcement. You know how we know, because FBI told ICE that. Because now anyone can wear a mask and pretend to be ice to kidnap people. That really interferes with law enforcement man