←back to thread

55 points 1659447091 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
JumpCrisscross ◴[] No.45958231[source]
The most successful land-based hunters are variants of dogs and cats [1]. (House cats remain in the top ten.)

Humans broke the game by allying with or exterminating other apex predators. I don’t believe another double-apex alliance is seen anywhere else, in our biosphere or in the fossil record.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunting_success

replies(2): >>45958312 #>>45959165 #
nomel ◴[] No.45958312[source]
No, we broke the game by domestication, where we simplified hunting to walking the animal into the slaughterhouse. Mammalian wildlife is < 5% of mammalian biomass on earth, with humans being around 30% and domesticated animals being around 60% [1].

For example, there are around 30 billion chickens in the world, butchered within 6-8 weeks. Repeat.

Domestication was partly the result of not eliminating apex predators. A shepherd would guard a flock of sheep, and farmers would historically live/sleep near/with the animals, to protect them day and night.

[1] https://wildlife.org/on-a-global-scale-livestock-outweighs-w...

replies(3): >>45958953 #>>45959773 #>>45960074 #
fellowniusmonk ◴[] No.45958953[source]
I think this is quite obviously a Yes And situation.

We've broken the game so many damn times, humans are awesome and we need to keep being awesome.

Somebodies gotta prevent an asteroid from killing the earth over these next 100 years.

It ain't gonna be the dolphins.

Speaking of which, we really need to ask the dolphins if they'd like some thumbs.

replies(3): >>45959794 #>>45959845 #>>45966344 #
1. faidit ◴[] No.45966344[source]
That's if we don't extinct ourselves (and the dolphins) first.