←back to thread

A graph explorer of the Epstein emails

(epstein-doc-explorer-1.onrender.com)
322 points cratermoon | 4 comments | 15 Nov 25 07:27 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
theultdev ◴[17 Nov 25 21:02 UTC] No.45958255[source]▶
This is the best rendition I've seen so far.

The Bill Clinton entity is interesting.

> 2009: Bill Clinton discontinued association with Jeffrey Epstein

> 2010: Jeffrey Epstein provided flights on jets to Bill Clinton

> 2010-2011: Jeffrey Epstein traveled via private aircraft with Bill Clinton

> 2011: Ghislaine Maxwell piloted helicopter for Bill Clinton

> 2014: Bill Clinton alleged presence at sex parties

> 2015: Bill Clinton distanced relationship from Jeffrey Epstein

Wasn't very good at discontinuing the relationship it seems.

Guess there is precedent for him lying about sexual activities though.

I think a sentiment analysis between the friendliness and social meetups between Epstein and other individuals would be useful.

Who were his friends after 2008 when he was first convicted?

Those who were still friends with him after 2008 were in on it or guilty by association, if not legally, socially.

Friends like Reid Hoffman and Larry Summers...

> From: Reid Hoffman

> Sent: 7/6/2015 5:04:31 PM

> To: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com]

> Subject: RE: ICYMI

> slow progress.

> planning to see you in August.

> Hope you're well.

Larry Summers has too many to list. Doesn't look good though digging through them.

replies(4): >>45958665 #>>45958729 #>>45960299 #>>45961332 #
tinyplanets[dead post] ◴[17 Nov 25 21:40 UTC] No.45958665[source]▶
[flagged]
theultdev ◴[17 Nov 25 21:42 UTC] No.45958685[source]▶
Of course, deflect discussion to Trump. Does that make any of those other people look better to you?

Trump gave information against Epstein in 2009 and unlike Bill and others did cut ties after learning he was poaching girls from Mar-a-Lago.

I specifically made the point to look into those who were friends with Epstein even after knowing what he was doing.

Nice whataboutism though. Feel free to reference source materials to support your claims.

Btw are you a bot or is that just a canned statement you use?

replies(6): >>45958762 #>>45959420 #>>45959542 #>>45959604 #>>45960309 #>>45960472 #
hiccuphippo ◴[17 Nov 25 23:20 UTC] No.45959604[source]▶
Well for one those other people are not the current president of the most powerful country in the world.

But sure, lock all of them up, just don't ignore a few because they are too powerful.

replies(2): >>45960107 #>>45960717 #
theultdev ◴[18 Nov 25 02:25 UTC] No.45960717[source]▶
Sure. What evidence would you like to use to lock Trump up?

Point to an email in this dump or anything else.

It's clear as day Trump cut ties when he found out who he was and was against him.

Not so much for others.

replies(2): >>45961013 #>>45961882 #
wredcoll ◴[18 Nov 25 03:17 UTC] No.45961013[source]▶
> cut ties after learning he was poaching girls from Mar-a-Lago.

This is, uh, not the slam dunk you seem to think it is.

replies(1): >>45962026 #
1. rayiner ◴[18 Nov 25 06:34 UTC] No.45962026[source]▶
Yes it is. Trump cut ties because Epstein was poaching employees. That was confirmed by the employee in question, Virginia Giuffre, who always maintained that she was a normal masseuse at Mar-a-Lago: https://abcnews.go.com/US/virginia-giuffre-trump-jeffrey-eps...
replies(1): >>45965915 #
2. Zigurd ◴[18 Nov 25 13:50 UTC] No.45965915[source]▶
You swallowed "Trump cut ties" whole, on a thread discussing messages that prove that wasn't the case. Wow. If I'm ever accused of dozens of felonious depravities I'mma call you.
replies(2): >>45966157 #>>45969793 #
3. theultdev ◴[18 Nov 25 14:05 UTC] No.45966157[source]▶
> on a thread discussing messages that prove that wasn't the case

Point to the messages that proves that wasn't the case.

4. rayiner ◴[18 Nov 25 18:02 UTC] No.45969793[source]▶
I wrote “cut ties” because that’s the wording used by the post I was responding to. My point is to respond to the innuendo that Guiffre was providing some sort of sexual services at Mar-a-Lago when she consistently maintained that Trump wasn’t involved in anything like that. Please point me to the email that “proves that wasn’t the case.”