←back to thread

291 points meetpateltech | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.315s | source
Show context
lampiaio ◴[] No.45958532[source]
Reminds me of a funny WWII story:

Kenneth Arrow and his statisticians found that their long-range forecasts were no better than numbers pulled out of a hat. The forecasters agreed and asked their superiors to be relieved of this duty. The reply was: "The Commanding General is well aware that the forecasts are no good. However he needs them for planning purposes."

replies(4): >>45958976 #>>45959504 #>>45961382 #>>45963663 #
empath75 ◴[] No.45958976[source]
There is a fairly compelling argument that divination in the ancient world was not a useless waste of time, as is commonly assumed, but that having either a process or a person that can make essentially random choices for them allowed people to make hard, consequential decisions where they might otherwise be paralyzed, especially when the penalty for not acting was worse than making a mistake.
replies(6): >>45959127 #>>45959308 #>>45959545 #>>45959893 #>>45960161 #>>45960280 #
tekkk ◴[] No.45959545[source]
Never thought of that. Probably a bit too generous given that it could be just as well waste of time and resources, nevermind the bias of the voodoo doctor. Most of it was just weirdly provided therapy I suppose to relieve stress.

But it is funny that humans put a great lot of weight on social contracts and being given explicit orders, maybe even publicly, must help pursuing action instead of rumination. Especially in a world where things seemed to happen randomly anyway.

replies(1): >>45960146 #
schiffern ◴[] No.45960146[source]
"Evolution doesn't optimize for correctness, it optimizes for minimum error cost."

It's a subtle but important distinction.

replies(1): >>45960835 #
1. generativenoise ◴[] No.45960835[source]
That is such a good line. Another important note is the time horizon of that error function is often quite short.