←back to thread

271 points mithcs | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.236s | source
Show context
woodruffw ◴[] No.45953391[source]
Intentionally or not, this post demonstrates one of the things that makes safer abstractions in C less desirable: the shared pointer implementation uses a POSIX mutex, which means it’s (1) not cross platform, and (2) pays the mutex overhead even in provably single-threaded contexts. In other words, it’s not a zero-cost abstraction.

C++’s shared pointer has the same problem; Rust avoids it by having two types (Rc and Arc) that the developer can select from (and which the compiler will prevent you from using unsafely).

replies(13): >>45953466 #>>45953495 #>>45953667 #>>45954940 #>>45955297 #>>45955366 #>>45955631 #>>45955835 #>>45959088 #>>45959352 #>>45960616 #>>45962213 #>>45975677 #
1. kazinator ◴[] No.45960616[source]
ISO C has had mutexes since C11 I think.

In any case, you could use the provided primitives to wrap the C11 mutex, or any other mutex.

With some clever #ifdef, you can probably have a single or multithreaded build switch at compile time which makes all the mutex stuff do nothing.