←back to thread

291 points meetpateltech | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
lampiaio ◴[] No.45958532[source]
Reminds me of a funny WWII story:

Kenneth Arrow and his statisticians found that their long-range forecasts were no better than numbers pulled out of a hat. The forecasters agreed and asked their superiors to be relieved of this duty. The reply was: "The Commanding General is well aware that the forecasts are no good. However he needs them for planning purposes."

replies(4): >>45958976 #>>45959504 #>>45961382 #>>45963663 #
cogman10 ◴[] No.45959504[source]
I think it was a stats class where I learned this, but as it turns out bad weather is less common than good weather. To be a fairly accurate weather person, you merely need to say "there will be no precipitation" and you'll be right like 90% of the time anywhere on earth.

What makes that funny is that historically, weather forecasters have been less than 90% accurate.

Now, I will say that today's weather models are pretty dang amazing. The 10 day forecast rarely wrong for me.

replies(9): >>45959833 #>>45959883 #>>45959929 #>>45960371 #>>45960926 #>>45961442 #>>45962550 #>>45963014 #>>45963586 #
1. AYBABTME ◴[] No.45960371[source]
I think this depends a lot on the region. I find that forecast quality differs widely from region to region. My guess is that it's a matter of (1) some regions have less advanced models available to them and (2) some regions have fundamentally more complex and unpredictable weather patterns.

Concrete if anecdotal example: weather forecast in SF are fairly accurate but the weather patterns are also simple to predict with the Pacific High and the simpler high level mechanics at play. Weather forecasts in Seoul are quite often completely wrong, but the weather patterns are also much more dynamics at a macro level with competing large systems in China/Gobi desert and the Western Pacific.

I'm not a meteorologist, just a sailor who likes to look at weather.