←back to thread

287 points todsacerdoti | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
jlarocco ◴[] No.45958907[source]
IIRC MacRuby used to compile to native code on OSX using LLVM, and was supposed to support native OSX APIs and Objective-C frameworks. It always seemed like a neat idea, and a slick integration, but I guess Apple moved to Swift instead.

I'll have to pick up a copy of this "Ruby Under a Microscope" book when the new version comes out. I've always liked Ruby, I just haven't had much chance to use it.

replies(4): >>45959389 #>>45960079 #>>45962420 #>>45962682 #
eek2121 ◴[] No.45959389[source]
Typical. I may get absolutely destroyed for this, but being professionally proficient in a ton of languages, including Ruby and the ones I mention below, and the ones I'm about to mention:

This sounds like Microsoft when they moved from VB6 to VB.Net. At least they have a good thing going with C# though.

VB6 was quite an interesting beast. You could do basically everything that you could do in languages like C/C++, but in most cases, you could churn out code quicker. This even extended to DirectX/Direct3D! For Web pages? ASP Classic.

The tl;dr is that I really wish that ease of development were prioritized along with everything else. One of the reasons I like Ruby is the elegance of the language and ease of using it.

Note that I've been using it since the mid 2000s or so, but not exclusively (both it and VB6 defined my career, however). C# is my second most favorite.

If Ruby had the GUI design tools VB6 had, it would be interesting to look at the popularity stats

Anyway, I'm rambling, so there is that. ;)

replies(6): >>45959832 #>>45959941 #>>45960502 #>>45960661 #>>45961343 #>>45962695 #
blacksmith_tb ◴[] No.45959832[source]
What about something like Shoes[1]? I have played with it a little, just to make a simple UI to run some scripts I can run fine in a shell myself, but less-technical people may be too scared to fire up Terminal.app in order to do the same...

1: http://shoesrb.com/

replies(1): >>45959949 #
1. pizza234 ◴[] No.45959949[source]
Shoes was very limited, and could only be used for extremely simple applications.