←back to thread

418 points akagusu | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
altmind ◴[] No.45955071[source]
Do you remember that chrome lost FTP support recently? The protocol was widely used and simple enough.
replies(2): >>45955175 #>>45956002 #
chb ◴[] No.45955175[source]
Widely used? By whom? Devs who don't understand rsync or scp? Give me a practical scenario where a box is running FTP but not SSH.

Edit: then account for the fact that this rare breed of content uploader doesn't use an FTP client... there's absolutely no reason to have FTP client code in a browser. It's an attack surface that is utterly unnecessary.

replies(4): >>45955278 #>>45955390 #>>45959190 #>>45959889 #
1. superkuh ◴[] No.45959889[source]
By many scientific and educational organizations for distribution of data. Places where the outcome matters and the way to achieve it doesn't. An FTP client in a browser is incomparibly smaller attack surface than, say, executing every random program sent to you by arbitrary third parties (javascript).