←back to thread

391 points croes | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.388s | source
Show context
duxup ◴[] No.45955483[source]
I recently bought a cheap android device because I needed to test something on Android. The setup was about 3 hours of the device starting up, asking me questions, installing apps I explicitly told it not to, and then all sorts of other apps and OS updates trying to do their thing seemingly at once. I wasn't even transferring data, just a brand new phone, new google account.

What a horrible experience you get with some providers and phones.

It's to the point that I think there should be some sort of regulation that involves you getting a baseline experience on the OS rather than a bunch of malware out of the box.

replies(10): >>45955502 #>>45957276 #>>45957457 #>>45957756 #>>45957987 #>>45958074 #>>45958327 #>>45958370 #>>45958555 #>>45976735 #
consumer451 ◴[] No.45958370[source]
I haven't bought an android device for a few years, but the last time I did, it was also a very cheap one for testing. I chose an "Android One" to avoid all these issues. Is something like that still an option?
replies(1): >>45958513 #
1. robgibbons ◴[] No.45958513[source]
Your best bet might be one of the Pixel "a" series, which are Google's budget-oriented models. Stock vanilla Android with as little bloat as you can hope for.
replies(1): >>45962163 #
2. t0bia_s ◴[] No.45962163[source]
Those Pixels have options to open bootloader and after flashing custom ROM that is much cleaner (GrapheneOS) to lock it again. Which is currently most secure way to have clean and secure android device.