←back to thread

391 points croes | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
hersko ◴[] No.45955639[source]
So a Unity owned bloatware company being used by Samsung is now somehow controversial because it was founded in Israel? Am i reading this right?
replies(13): >>45955713 #>>45956222 #>>45956714 #>>45956724 #>>45956904 #>>45957001 #>>45957172 #>>45957250 #>>45957371 #>>45957425 #>>45957489 #>>45957551 #>>45972375 #
MomsAVoxell ◴[] No.45957250[source]
[flagged]
replies(4): >>45957404 #>>45958153 #>>45958324 #>>45958798 #
vladgur[dead post] ◴[] No.45957404[source]
[flagged]
potatototoo99 ◴[] No.45957600[source]
It wasn't a targeted attack since they had no way of knowing where the pagers would end up in the second-hand market, as they were only activated years later.
replies(3): >>45957647 #>>45957672 #>>45957689 #
victorbjorklund[dead post] ◴[] No.45957689[source]
[flagged]
MomsAVoxell ◴[] No.45957811[source]
The “War on Terror” has addled peoples minds so harshly that the notion that there is actually a legal way to wage war seems preposterous - however, there is a “legal means by which to wage war” which does in fact protect you, citizen, and you should learn about it - because when your representatives (and by proxy: you) violate those laws, you become personally liable for the repercussions that other victims will prosecute on you, and your nation state:

https://www.icrc.org/en/law-and-policy/geneva-conventions-an...

If ‘no bomb/missile ever is a war crime’, then .. there is no such thing as “terrorism”, either. (Although the argument could be made that there is no such thing as ‘terrorism’ at all, and that indeed, the word terrorism is merely a propaganda crutch used to justify atrocities against so-called ‘lesser cultures’ deemed inferior by the same institutions which used to use the ‘n-word’ to justify their atrocities in decades past, too, before that became difficult to do ..)

You can indeed commit war crimes with sticks too, though, incidentally.

replies(2): >>45958362 #>>45958748 #
galagawinkle489 ◴[] No.45958362[source]
The "legal way to wage war" is only relevant when you are waging war against an army. Hezbollah is not an army, it's a terrorist group. It attacks civilians. It doesn't wear uniforms. It ignores the laws of war.
replies(2): >>45958448 #>>45958473 #
1. MomsAVoxell ◴[] No.45958448[source]
Says you, and that is too easy:

“The IDF attacks civilians. It uses perfidy to indiscriminately attack the civilian population of its enemies. It, too, ignores the laws of war.”

There is no way to continue justifying acts of terror being committed by your in-group, without also become equivalent to the terrorist of your out-group.

replies(1): >>45958486 #
2. MomsAVoxell ◴[] No.45958579[source]
False. The truth is that the IDF does indeed do such things at massive scales.