←back to thread

391 points croes | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
duxup ◴[] No.45955483[source]
I recently bought a cheap android device because I needed to test something on Android. The setup was about 3 hours of the device starting up, asking me questions, installing apps I explicitly told it not to, and then all sorts of other apps and OS updates trying to do their thing seemingly at once. I wasn't even transferring data, just a brand new phone, new google account.

What a horrible experience you get with some providers and phones.

It's to the point that I think there should be some sort of regulation that involves you getting a baseline experience on the OS rather than a bunch of malware out of the box.

replies(10): >>45955502 #>>45957276 #>>45957457 #>>45957756 #>>45957987 #>>45958074 #>>45958327 #>>45958370 #>>45958555 #>>45976735 #
atonse ◴[] No.45955502[source]
My guess is, those auto installs is exactly how they keep the costs down, by subsidizing the cost with getting paid by companies to auto-install garbage.

It's the same with Smart TVs, they've gotten so cheap because of all the other slimy stuff the manufacturers do, like sell your watch data, or pre-install apps.

replies(7): >>45955521 #>>45955540 #>>45955607 #>>45956892 #>>45956989 #>>45957087 #>>45957261 #
esafak ◴[] No.45955521[source]
The problem is that you do not get the option to pay off the subsidy to get a clean install.
replies(2): >>45955778 #>>45957353 #
atonse ◴[] No.45955778[source]
I suppose the "paying off the subsidy" is to buy a more expensive phone. Or getting a Google Pixel. I've heard those are as much stock android as possible.
replies(1): >>45956413 #
xethos ◴[] No.45956413[source]
I agree, and that's the exact point I would make. The problem though, is I want a small phone with a headphone jack (and a physical keyboard, but that's orthogonal to the point).

Many OEMs sell their flagship as a shiny glass slab with only BT or USB-C for audio, and ship 3.5mm jacks and other "antiquated niceties" like a uSD card reader, on their lower-end models.

It's difficult to square the circle of "I want these specific features, but on a phone that's not working against me (any more than modern phones already do)"

replies(4): >>45957022 #>>45957044 #>>45957242 #>>45958056 #
ploxiln ◴[] No.45957242[source]
The "Sony Xperia 5 V" (I have the previous "Sony Xperia 5 IV") has a headphone jack, takes a uSD card, and is somewhat compact. (And no silly camera cutout in the screen, it's in a reasonably small bezel.)

EDIT: also see the Xperia 10 VII for a phone that isn't 2 years old (I haven't been keeping up, I buy phones to use for 4+ years)

replies(1): >>45957779 #
1. pmontra ◴[] No.45957779[source]
According to the specs it's 154 x 68 x 8.6 mm and 182 grams, so it's more compact than most phones of 2025 but not really compact. My Samsung A40 is smaller and lighter but it's 4 years older.