←back to thread

418 points akagusu | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
nwellnhof ◴[] No.45955183[source]
Removing XSLT from browsers was long overdue and I'm saying that as ex-maintainer of libxslt who probably triggered (not caused) this removal. What's more interesting is that Chromium plans to switch to a Rust-based XML parser. Currently, they seem to favor xml-rs which only implements a subset of XML. So apparently, Google is willing to remove standards-compliant XML support as well. This is a lot more concerning.
replies(11): >>45955239 #>>45955425 #>>45955442 #>>45955667 #>>45955747 #>>45955961 #>>45956057 #>>45957011 #>>45957170 #>>45957880 #>>45977574 #
xmcp123 ◴[] No.45955239[source]
It’s interesting to see the casual slide of Google towards almost internet explorer 5.1 style behavior, where standards can just be ignored “because market share”.

Having flashbacks of “<!--[if IE 6]> <script src="fix-ie6.js"></script> <![endif]-->”

replies(4): >>45955346 #>>45955370 #>>45955787 #>>45956032 #
granzymes ◴[] No.45955346[source]
The standards body is deprecating XSLT with support from Mozilla and Safari (Mozilla first proposed the removal).

Not sure how you got from that to “Google is ignoring standards”.

replies(5): >>45955574 #>>45955964 #>>45955987 #>>45957993 #>>45965422 #
echelon ◴[] No.45955964[source]
Then standards body is Google and a bunch of companies consuming Google engine code.
replies(1): >>45956047 #
dewey ◴[] No.45956047{3}[source]
I guess you mean except Mozilla and Safari...which are the two other competing browser engines? It's not like a it's a room full of Chromium based browsers.
replies(2): >>45956341 #>>45958277 #
Forgeties79 ◴[] No.45956341{4}[source]
Safari yes

Mozilla…are they actually competing? Like really and truly.

replies(1): >>45956635 #
bigyabai ◴[] No.45956635{5}[source]
Mozilla has proven they can exist in a free market; really and truly, they do compete.

Safari is what I'm concerned about. Without Apple's monopoly control, Safari is guaranteed to be a dead engine. WebKit isn't well-enough supported on Linux and Windows to compete against Blink and Gecko, which suggests that Safari is the most expendable engine of the three.

replies(4): >>45956683 #>>45957121 #>>45957268 #>>45960565 #
1. nerdponx ◴[] No.45957268{6}[source]
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45955979 this sibling comment says it best