←back to thread

Project Gemini

(geminiprotocol.net)
327 points andsoitis | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
netdevphoenix ◴[] No.45955050[source]
Why do programmers have so little imagination when it comes to names? It should almost never be the case that project names conflict
replies(9): >>45955065 #>>45955188 #>>45955311 #>>45955326 #>>45955453 #>>45955675 #>>45955724 #>>45955739 #>>45956110 #
myaccountonhn ◴[] No.45955065[source]
Ask Google, this project predates the LLM.
replies(3): >>45955258 #>>45955419 #>>45955806 #
ChipopLeMoral ◴[] No.45955419[source]
Back when I was a Googler, I used to play a little game where I would think of a random word and then check if there was a Google internal project code named for it. It was a bit hard finding stuff that wasn't some system or project, and often there would be multiple ones. I actually found one that I thought would be a nice name and reserved the go link for it, but naming anything after it never panned out, when I finally got to design a system from scratch my manager wanted a boring descriptive name like "consolidated data system" (it was a bit more specific but that was the vibe).

Side note: I noticed that more "boring" and less sexy projects had cooler names a lot of the time, and my theory was that people were compensating for doing unsexy work.

replies(3): >>45955550 #>>45955752 #>>45956039 #
mattlondon ◴[] No.45956039[source]
Please no more "Project Espresso" nonsense that is entirely meaningless to anyone reading this.

Pick a descriptive name. Everyone else who is not in your team will thank you.

replies(1): >>45956834 #
1. kixiQu ◴[] No.45956834[source]
An alternate take that I tend to agree with:

https://medium.com/better-programming/software-component-nam...