←back to thread

Project Gemini

(geminiprotocol.net)
327 points andsoitis | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
RealCodingOtaku ◴[] No.45955751[source]
I have got only two annoyance on Gemini, lack of inline links and _font styling_, and they are by design (https://geminiprotocol.net/docs/faq.gmi#44-questions-about-t...)

It's fine for something like HN, but I heavily rely on named links and emphasis on all my blogs and is a dealbreaker.

replies(5): >>45955811 #>>45956011 #>>45957752 #>>45958605 #>>45961158 #
mattlondon ◴[] No.45956011[source]
Yeah they missed an opportunity to more fully support something more like markdown that offered in-line links and basic text formatting. Missing tables is also quite the deal breaker for a bunch of things.

But yeah it seems like these lack of features is a willful and highly-opinionated approach to what the author of the protocol wants to take a stance on (their excuse is ease of implementation for clients, but I think it is a more of a deliberate choice). That's fine. It's their protocol and they can do what they want with it, but I think they missed an opportunity for it to take off.

Various people since have suggested we just settle on HTML 4 (with no scripting) and we'd be way better off and I agree.

replies(2): >>45956503 #>>45959681 #
1. jay_kyburz ◴[] No.45956503[source]
And CSS from the client only!