←back to thread

160 points riordan | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
hodgehog11 ◴[] No.45954362[source]
I've always been curious why a cost-effective widespread implementation of geothermal energy has never been considered a holy grail of energy production, at least not in the public debate. Much of the discussion is so focussed on nuclear fusion, which seems so much harder and less likely to be reliable.
replies(11): >>45954476 #>>45954489 #>>45954493 #>>45954510 #>>45954566 #>>45954710 #>>45954804 #>>45955903 #>>45956518 #>>45957024 #>>45959700 #
hackeraccount ◴[] No.45955903[source]
Harder absolutely but "less likely to be reliable"?

If economically viable fusion was "cracked" what would the nature of it's unreliability even be?

replies(2): >>45956499 #>>45959867 #
1. hcknwscommenter ◴[] No.45956499[source]
all the machinery used to obtain and maintain an economically viable fusion reaction. Having worked with particle accelerators and synchrotron rings, I'll tell you that stuff breaks down all the time.