←back to thread

203 points mooreds | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.846s | source
1. tptacek ◴[] No.45956485[source]
This is a rare case where the original bait-y title is probably better than the de-bait-ified title, because the actual article is much less of a brag and much more of an actual case study.
replies(1): >>45956546 #
2. dang ◴[] No.45956546[source]
Re-how'd, plus I've resisted the temptation to insert a comma that feels missing to me.
replies(2): >>45956658 #>>45957944 #
3. tptacek ◴[] No.45956658[source]
"How?! When AWS was down: we were not!"
4. wparad ◴[] No.45957944[source]
I spent a long time, trying to figure out, what the title of the article, should be. I'm terrible at SEO and generating click-bait titles, it is unfortunately, what, it, is.
replies(1): >>45958874 #
5. dang ◴[] No.45958874{3}[source]
You did fine! The title is clear. I was just being playful.