←back to thread

311 points eustoria | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
yegle ◴[] No.45948757[source]
Free Cloudflare account cannot be used to serve my Plex server. To me that's a no-go.

The specific term is: https://www.cloudflare.com/service-specific-terms-applicatio...

replies(7): >>45948839 #>>45949424 #>>45950008 #>>45950557 #>>45951591 #>>45952922 #>>45953103 #
mandelken ◴[] No.45948839[source]
My free account runs cloudflared tunnel just fine for jellyfin. Is it just plex?

I use the tunnel because my girlfriend cant install tailscale on her work laptop, so this way she can still login to jellyfin while traveling.

replies(1): >>45949257 #
369548684892826 ◴[] No.45949257[source]
It’s not that it can’t do it, it’s that it’s against the terms of service to use it for video.
replies(4): >>45950112 #>>45950233 #>>45952403 #>>45952467 #
mycall ◴[] No.45950233{3}[source]
You can't play corporate videos over Cloudflare Warp? Where is the line drawn?
replies(1): >>45950452 #
tombert ◴[] No.45950452{4}[source]
I think they don't want you using a boatload of bandwidth, since data proxies through their servers.
replies(1): >>45953721 #
wink ◴[] No.45953721{5}[source]
Yes and that's what people are criticizing - it's just an arbitrary and thus very bad rule. Completely unrelated to CloudFlare, I streamed a single TV series from a friend's plex account 1-2y ago, that's less traffic than some of my friends use in 2 weeks.

I'm not saying they can't have that rule, it's their infra - I'm just saying that "a boatload of bandwidth" can be anything, depending on who you ask.

replies(1): >>45956414 #
1. tombert ◴[] No.45956414{6}[source]
FWIW, even if it’s against the rules I have been using Cloudflare tunnels for my Jellyfin server for months and I haven’t even gotten a nastygram yet.

I think it’s more of a “we reserve the right to…” situation than anything else.