←back to thread

418 points akagusu | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
dfabulich ◴[] No.45955306[source]
In part 1 of this article, the author wrote, "XSLT is an essential companion to RSS, as it allows the feed itself to be perused in the browser"

Actually, you can make an RSS feed user-browsable by using JavaScript instead. You can even run XSLT in JavaScript, which is what Google's polyfill does.

I've written thousands of lines of XSLT. JavaScript is better than XSLT in every way, which is why JavaScript has thrived and XSLT has dwindled.

This is why XSLT has got to go: https://www.offensivecon.org/speakers/2025/ivan-fratric.html

replies(7): >>45955537 #>>45955587 #>>45955938 #>>45955985 #>>45956639 #>>45956745 #>>45958606 #
1. ErroneousBosh ◴[] No.45955938[source]
> In part 1 of this article, the author wrote, "XSLT is an essential companion to RSS, as it allows the feed itself to be perused in the browser"

Wow. I can see the proposed scrapping of XSLT being a huge problem for all of the seven people who do this.