←back to thread

418 points akagusu | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.2s | source
Show context
Aurornis ◴[] No.45955140[source]
I have yet to read an article complaining about XSLT deprecation from someone who can explain why they actually used it and why it’s important to them.

> I will keep using XSLT, and in fact will look for new opportunities to rely on it.

This is the closest I’ve seen, but it’s not an explanation of why it was important before the deprecation. It’s a declaration that they’re using it as an act of rebellion.

replies(10): >>45955238 #>>45955283 #>>45955351 #>>45955795 #>>45955805 #>>45955821 #>>45956141 #>>45956722 #>>45956976 #>>45958239 #
zekica ◴[] No.45955351[source]
I used it. It's an (ugly) functional programming language that can transform one XML into another - think of it as Lisp for XML processing but even less readable.

It can work great when you have XML you want to present nicely in a browser by transforming it into XHTML while still serving the browser the original XML. One use I had was to show the contents of RSS/Atom feeds as a nice page in a browser.

replies(2): >>45955386 #>>45956298 #
1. fuzzzerd ◴[] No.45955386[source]
I have done same thing with sitemap.xml.