←back to thread

295 points todsacerdoti | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
ef2k ◴[] No.45949896[source]
> I’m still trying to figure out what kinds of open source are worth writing in this new era

Is there any upside to opensourcing anything anymore? Anything published today becomes training data for the next model, with no attribution to the original work.

If the goal is to experiment, share ideas, or let others learn from the work, maybe the better default now is "source available", instead of FOSS in the classic sense. It gives people visibility while setting clearer boundaries on how the work can be used.

I learned most of what I know thanks to FOSS projects so I'm still on the fence on this.

replies(6): >>45949925 #>>45950185 #>>45950283 #>>45950928 #>>45951508 #>>45953096 #
theturtlemoves ◴[] No.45951508[source]
You're not obligated to give away your mind for free. You're free to share, of course. But sharing implies reciprocity, a back and forth. The internet used to be like that, but if the environment changes, you adapt your behavior accordingly.

In the long run I think it's time to starve the system from input until it's attitude reverts to reciprocal. It's not what I'd want, but it seems necessary. People learn from consequences, not from words alone

replies(1): >>45952232 #
1. immibis ◴[] No.45952232[source]
Or use AGPL licenses. As a bonus, nobody in JavaScript checks licenses so you might be able to sue Amazon for money.