←back to thread

1160 points vxvxvx | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.225s | source

Earlier thread: Disrupting the first reported AI-orchestrated cyber espionage campaign - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45918638 - Nov 2025 (281 comments)
Show context
kace91 ◴[] No.45944510[source]
Does Anthropic currently have cybersec people able to provide a standard assessment of the kind the community expects?

This could be a corporate move as some people claim, but I wonder if the cause is simply that their talents are currently somewhere else and they don’t have the company structure in place to deliver properly in this matter.

(If that is the case they are not then free of blame, it’s just a different conversation)

replies(5): >>45944738 #>>45944891 #>>45945158 #>>45945574 #>>45949070 #
CuriouslyC ◴[] No.45944738[source]
I throw Anthropic under the bus a lot for their lack of engineering acumen. If they don't have a core competency like engineering fully covered, I'd say there's a near 0% chance they have something like security covered.
replies(1): >>45944975 #
fredoliveira ◴[] No.45944975[source]
What makes you think they lack engineering acumen?
replies(1): >>45944996 #
CuriouslyC ◴[] No.45944996[source]
The hot mess that is Claude Code (if you multi-orchestrate with it, it'll start to grind even very powerful systems to a halt, 15+ seconds of unresponsiveness, all because CC constantly serializes/deserializes a JSON data file that grows quite large every time you do stuff), their horrible service uptime compared to all their competitors, their month long performance degradation their users had to scream at them to get them to investigate, the fact that they had to outsource their web client and it's still bad, etc.
replies(4): >>45945133 #>>45946494 #>>45946921 #>>45948753 #
1. saagarjha ◴[] No.45948753[source]
You think Anthropic’s engineering talent for infosec is possible to determine because…you’ve used Claude Code? Am I understanding this right?