←back to thread

1424 points moonleay | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.003s | source
Show context
isoprophlex ◴[] No.45943174[source]
From a bit further down the page

> Bluetooth DID (Device Identification) Hook > Turns out, if you change the manufacturerid to that of Apple, you get access to several special features!

I hope Apple gets slammed hard by some regulatory body. Apparently there's absolutely zero magic reasons why their airpods are unable to connect to non-Apple devices; pretend you're an iPhone and you're in.

EDIT: read "unable to connect" => "unable to expose advanced functionality", ofc they connect just fine

replies(15): >>45943218 #>>45943230 #>>45943299 #>>45943335 #>>45943389 #>>45943452 #>>45943491 #>>45943620 #>>45943639 #>>45943933 #>>45944000 #>>45945287 #>>45945990 #>>45946884 #>>45950063 #
exitb ◴[] No.45943230[source]
AirPods can connect to any device and perform on par with other Bluetooth headphones. This is about availability of special features which require a dedicated driver non-Apple devices are not expected to have.
replies(6): >>45943697 #>>45944080 #>>45944871 #>>45946495 #>>45947945 #>>45952870 #
kakacik ◴[] No.45943697[source]
This is patently incorrect. Wife switched from iphone 13 mini to samsung s24, and airpods pro 2nd gen immediately started behaving extremely annoyingly to the point of becoming completely useless for any serious use and she just gave them away to her sister which still is on apple, although she loved them before.

Literally all other earpieces work flawlessly with that phone including dirt cheap chinese stuff, apart from apple.

Now somebody could come and claim multi trillion company couldnt just nail that pesky bluetooth protocol well, but everybody else can do it better than them, including 15 bucks products. Its all by design. They clearly dont need hardware revenue to have products who can compete on open market, they need their closed ecosystem revenue, hence these dirty practices. There is hopefully a billion or ten lawsuit in the making by courts with balls, ie EU.

All the downvotes in the world won't change above.

replies(7): >>45943711 #>>45943798 #>>45943858 #>>45943953 #>>45945416 #>>45945540 #>>45945944 #
talkingtab ◴[] No.45945416[source]
Just take apple to small claims court. If everyone who is scammed by Apple takes them to small claims they will have an incentive to change. Without this they have -0.00000000000 incentive to do anything. Even a class action suit won't help. The fundamental question is whether Apple should be able to sell products with lock in. Since there is lockin on all Apple products it is not accidental. In my humble opinion only. You, dear reader, work out your own thoughts.
replies(2): >>45945859 #>>45946712 #
jcalvinowens ◴[] No.45945859{4}[source]
> Just take apple to small claims court.

You can't do that, you certainly agreed to binding arbitration with apple at some point.

replies(1): >>45948518 #
1. WheatMillington ◴[] No.45948518{5}[source]
Very American-centric response. You cannot contract out of small claims court exposure in my country.
replies(1): >>45954817 #
2. jcalvinowens ◴[] No.45954817[source]
Go try to actually recover damages from apple and let me know how that goes for you :)