←back to thread

311 points eustoria | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.196s | source
Show context
plantinthebok ◴[] No.45947870[source]
What's the actual win here? Avoiding relay latency in the rare cases Tailscale can't punch through NAT? If that's it, a $3 VPS running Headscale seems simpler. The complexity feels like you're optimizing for the 5% case while adding permanent vendor lock in. What am I missing?
replies(6): >>45947999 #>>45948012 #>>45948016 #>>45948087 #>>45948806 #>>45952600 #
1. throwaway678339 ◴[] No.45947999[source]
I don't think you are missing anything. They have a bunch of half baked features like this that aren't as robust as real security vendors and lock you in just like you said.