←back to thread

198 points todsacerdoti | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.394s | source
Show context
DeepYogurt ◴[] No.45942404[source]
Has anyone done a talk/blog/whatever on how llm crawlers are different than classical crawlers? I'm not up on the difference.
replies(5): >>45942457 #>>45942733 #>>45942771 #>>45942875 #>>45946525 #
btown ◴[] No.45942875[source]
IMO there was something of a de facto contract, pre-LLMs, that the set of things one would publicly mirror/excerpt/index and the set of things one would scrape were one and the same.

Back then, legitimate search engines wouldn’t want to scrape things that would just make their search results less relevant with garbage data anyways, so by and large they would honor robots.txt and not overwhelm upstream servers. Bad actors existed, of course, but were very rarely backed by companies valued in the billions of dollars.

People training foundation models now have no such constraints or qualms - they need as many human-written sentences as possible, regardless of the context in which they are extracted. That’s coupled with a broader familiarity with ubiquitous residential proxy providers that can tunnel traffic through consumer connections worldwide. That’s an entirely different social contract, one we are still navigating.

replies(3): >>45943046 #>>45943240 #>>45943282 #
cwbriscoe ◴[] No.45943240[source]
I am not well versed in this problem but can't the web servers rate limit by known IP addresses of these crawler/scrapers?
replies(4): >>45943317 #>>45943344 #>>45943570 #>>45943597 #
Yoric ◴[] No.45943570[source]
Not the exact same problem, but a few months ago, I tried to block youtube traffic from my home (I was writing a parental app for my child) by IP. After a few hours of trying to collect IPs, I gave up, realizing that YouTube was dynamically load-balanced across millions of IPs, some of which also served traffic from other Google services I didn't want to block.

I wouldn't be surprised if it was the same with LLMs. Millions of workers allocated dynamically on AWS, with varying IPs.

In my specific case, as I was dealing with browser-initiated traffic, I wrote a Firefox add-on instead. No such shortcut for web servers, though.

replies(2): >>45943593 #>>45947250 #
1. m3047 ◴[] No.45947250[source]
Yoric, dropping some knowledge vis a vis the downstream regarding DNS:

* https://www.dnsrpz.info/

* https://github.com/m3047/rear_view_rpz

replies(1): >>45955279 #
2. Yoric ◴[] No.45955279[source]
Thanks!