←back to thread

1424 points moonleay | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.24s | source
Show context
isoprophlex ◴[] No.45943174[source]
From a bit further down the page

> Bluetooth DID (Device Identification) Hook > Turns out, if you change the manufacturerid to that of Apple, you get access to several special features!

I hope Apple gets slammed hard by some regulatory body. Apparently there's absolutely zero magic reasons why their airpods are unable to connect to non-Apple devices; pretend you're an iPhone and you're in.

EDIT: read "unable to connect" => "unable to expose advanced functionality", ofc they connect just fine

replies(15): >>45943218 #>>45943230 #>>45943299 #>>45943335 #>>45943389 #>>45943452 #>>45943491 #>>45943620 #>>45943639 #>>45943933 #>>45944000 #>>45945287 #>>45945990 #>>45946884 #>>45950063 #
zozbot234 ◴[] No.45943639[source]
This should indeed be reported as illegal product tying to regulators (U.S. FTC/EU Competition commission/others?) so that Apple is legally deterred from breaking this interoperability effort with future AirPods updates.
replies(2): >>45943670 #>>45943687 #
mgh95 ◴[] No.45943670[source]
Worse, now device manufacturers can now make their devices identify as "apple" out of the box and advertise it as "compatibility with Apple AirPods features X, Y, X" and be legally permissible.

It's basically the consequence Google v. Oracle and the cases leading to it.

replies(2): >>45947149 #>>45947185 #
1. russianGuy83829 ◴[] No.45947185[source]
like every browser identifying as Mozilla in the user agent