←back to thread

1424 points moonleay | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
isoprophlex ◴[] No.45943174[source]
From a bit further down the page

> Bluetooth DID (Device Identification) Hook > Turns out, if you change the manufacturerid to that of Apple, you get access to several special features!

I hope Apple gets slammed hard by some regulatory body. Apparently there's absolutely zero magic reasons why their airpods are unable to connect to non-Apple devices; pretend you're an iPhone and you're in.

EDIT: read "unable to connect" => "unable to expose advanced functionality", ofc they connect just fine

replies(15): >>45943218 #>>45943230 #>>45943299 #>>45943335 #>>45943389 #>>45943452 #>>45943491 #>>45943620 #>>45943639 #>>45943933 #>>45944000 #>>45945287 #>>45945990 #>>45946884 #>>45950063 #
zozbot234 ◴[] No.45943639[source]
This should indeed be reported as illegal product tying to regulators (U.S. FTC/EU Competition commission/others?) so that Apple is legally deterred from breaking this interoperability effort with future AirPods updates.
replies(2): >>45943670 #>>45943687 #
mytailorisrich ◴[] No.45943687[source]
What makes this illegal product tying under specific laws?
replies(1): >>45943746 #
montagg ◴[] No.45943746[source]
It’s, hilariously, the opposite: the exposure of this idea makes every other product better and Apple can’t change it (until they do).

Product tying is not a thing you can bypass.

This is idea is independent of whether Apple’s strategy is good or bad, legal or not. Product tying can’t be undermined, or it’s not actually a problem.

replies(1): >>45944127 #
BoredPositron ◴[] No.45944127[source]
I still don't see the illegal part. I am in VFX and have three dongles connected to use specific software packages...
replies(1): >>45945897 #
acka ◴[] No.45945897[source]
Dongle-based license management or DRM isn't the same as product tying; each dongle just validates the license for the use of a piece of software. But forcing customers to only use ink cartridges from a specific brand, deliberately rejecting or invalidating third-party refill options? That is a form of product tying, and it is being deemed illegal in more and more countries.
replies(1): >>45946430 #
1. mytailorisrich ◴[] No.45946430[source]
How is Apple forcing anything with AirPods and how is it illegal?