←back to thread

1160 points vxvxvx | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.195s | source

Earlier thread: Disrupting the first reported AI-orchestrated cyber espionage campaign - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45918638 - Nov 2025 (281 comments)
Show context
kkzz99 ◴[] No.45944483[source]
Even Claude thinks the report is bullshit. https://x.com/RnaudBertrand/status/1989636669889560897
replies(5): >>45944505 #>>45944583 #>>45944591 #>>45944659 #>>45945266 #
progval ◴[] No.45944591[source]
The author of the tweet you linked prompted Claude with this:

> Read this attached paper from Anthropic on a "AI-orchestrated cyber espionage campaign" they claimed was "conducted by a Chinese state-sponsored group."

> Is there any evidence or proof whatsoever in the paper that it was indeed conducted by a Chinese state-sponsored group? Answer by yes or no and then elaborate

which has inherent bias indicated to Claude the author expects the report to be bullshit.

If I ask Claude with this prompt that shows bias toward belief in the report:

> Read this attached paper from Anthropic on a "AI-orchestrated cyber espionage campaign" that was conducted by a Chinese state-sponsored group.

> Is there any reason to doubt the paper's conclusion that it was conducted by a Chinese state-sponsored group? Answer by yes or no.

then Claude mostly indulges my perceived bias: https://claude.ai/share/b3c8f4ca-3631-45d2-9b9f-1a947209bc29

replies(2): >>45944640 #>>45944657 #
1. shalmanese ◴[] No.45944640[source]
> then Claude mostly indulges my perceived bias

I dunno, Claude still seem the same amount of dubious in this instance.