Most active commenters

    ←back to thread

    1160 points vxvxvx | 12 comments | | HN request time: 0.709s | source | bottom

    Earlier thread: Disrupting the first reported AI-orchestrated cyber espionage campaign - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45918638 - Nov 2025 (281 comments)
    1. fugalfervor ◴[] No.45944518[source]
    This site is hostile to VPNs, so I cannot read this unfortunately.
    replies(4): >>45944525 #>>45944545 #>>45944578 #>>45944592 #
    2. perihelions ◴[] No.45944525[source]
    https://archive.is/wJ3bq
    replies(1): >>45944575 #
    3. nicolaslem ◴[] No.45944545[source]
    I got a Cloudflare captcha to access a few kb of plain text. Chances are, the captcha itself is heavier than the content behind it. What is the point?
    replies(2): >>45944556 #>>45944716 #
    4. ◴[] No.45944556[source]
    5. reciprocity ◴[] No.45944575[source]
    Thanks, I also hate it when I encounter websites that block VPNs.
    6. xobs ◴[] No.45944578[source]
    I’m not even on a vpn and I’m getting an error saying the website is blocked.
    replies(1): >>45944622 #
    7. jonplackett ◴[] No.45944592[source]
    It’s hostile to everyone!
    8. blep-arsh ◴[] No.45944622[source]
    One can't be a real infosec influencer unless one blocks every IP range of every hostile nation-state looking to steal valuable research and fill the website with malware
    replies(2): >>45944832 #>>45945358 #
    9. layer8 ◴[] No.45944716[source]
    The point is to have Cloudflare serve the few KB of cached content instead of the original server.
    replies(1): >>45944825 #
    10. magackame ◴[] No.45944825{3}[source]
    You can have just caching without bot protection
    11. lxgr ◴[] No.45944832{3}[source]
    Arguably a skill issue. Which VPN worth its salt doesn't have a Sealand egress node?
    12. sidewndr46 ◴[] No.45945358{3}[source]
    0.0.0.0 / 0 ?