←back to thread

68 points Lyngbakr | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0.814s | source | bottom
Show context
broodbucket ◴[] No.45909310[source]
Maybe this is a new low for the more regular consumer facing stuff, but this is hardly new for Apple. The $1000 wheels come to mind.
replies(2): >>45909346 #>>45909368 #
1. JimDabell ◴[] No.45909368[source]
Apple were also widely ridiculed for the iPad (just a big iPhone), AirPods (everybody who wears them looks goofy), and Apple Watch (ugly square).
replies(2): >>45909752 #>>45909974 #
2. ghaff ◴[] No.45909752[source]
Apple Watch also that no one not a boomer wears watches any longer.
replies(3): >>45909874 #>>45909977 #>>45911583 #
3. LeoPanthera ◴[] No.45909874[source]
You're kidding, right? It's ubiquitous. I see it everywhere. It's almost unusual to see someone wearing a watch that isn't one.
4. broodbucket ◴[] No.45909974[source]
Screenshot this when the iPhone Pocket is the hot new product everyone must buy, but somehow I don't think these are even remotely in the same category. I don't think Ballmer laughing at the iPhone's price is in the same category as this or the wheels, somehow. Maybe I'm just not enough of a thought leader.
5. broodbucket ◴[] No.45909977[source]
Yeah this is out of touch. They're definitely still popular, and besides, older generations exist and their product preferences are valid
6. mariusor ◴[] No.45911583[source]
Except for all the young, fit people that want to track their workouts and health. Maybe the time of watches that just tell time has passed - I would argue even against that with the continuing existence of Swiss luxury brands - but watch as a small health monitor is still in full force.