←back to thread

Fighting the New York Times' invasion of user privacy

(openai.com)
283 points meetpateltech | 1 comments | 12 Nov 25 14:08 UTC | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
1vuio0pswjnm7 ◴[12 Nov 25 16:11 UTC] No.45901917[source]▶
"The New York Times is demanding that we turn over 20 million of your private ChatGPT conversations."

As might any plaintiff. NYT might be the first of many others and the lawsuits may not be limited to copyright claims

Why has OpenAI collected and stored 20 million conversations (including "deleted chats")

What is the purpose of OpenAI storing millions of private conversations

By contrast the purpose of NYT's request is both clear and limited

The documents requested are not being made public by the plaintiffs. The documents will presumably be redacted to protect any confidential information before being produced to the plaintiffs, the documents can only be used by the plaintiffs for the purpose of the litigation against OpenAI and, unlike OpenAI who has collected and stored these conversations for as long as OpenAI desires, the plaintiffs are prohibited from retaining copies of the documents after the litigation is concluded

The privacy issue here has been created by OpenAI for their own commercial benefit

It is not even clear what this benefit, if any, will be as OpenAI continues to search for a "business model"

Wanton data collection

replies(10): >>45902173 #>>45902539 #>>45903180 #>>45903873 #>>45904258 #>>45904285 #>>45905079 #>>45906333 #>>45909891 #>>45910186 #
Aurornis ◴[12 Nov 25 18:53 UTC] No.45904285[source]▶
> What is the purpose of OpenAI storing millions of private conversations

Your previous ChatGPT conversations show up right in the ChatGPT interface.

They have to store the private conversations to enable users to bring them up in the interface.

This isn't a secretive, hidden data collection. It's a clear and obvious feature right in the product. They're fighting for the ability to not retain secret records of past conversations that have been deleted.

The problem with the court order is that it requires them to keep the conversations even after a user presses the 'Delete' button on them.

replies(1): >>45907525 #
baobun ◴[12 Nov 25 22:09 UTC] No.45907525[source]▶
They could have been stored at the client, and encrypted before optionally synced back to OpenAI servers in a way that the stored chats can only be read back by the user. Signal illustrates how this is possible.

OpenAI made a choice in how the feature was and is implemented.

replies(4): >>45907701 #>>45908889 #>>45908891 #>>45908953 #
1. nl ◴[13 Nov 25 00:27 UTC] No.45908891[source]▶
Signal does End-to-end encryption, so they (Signal) can never read it.

The whole point of ChatGPT conversations is so they can be read by the model on the server.

Conversations are kept around because they can be picked up and continued at any point (I use this feature frequently).

Additionally you can use conversations in their scheduled notification feature, where the conversation is replayed and updates are sent to you, all done on the server.

> OpenAI made a choice in how the feature was and is implemented.

Indeed they did, and it was a sensible choice given how the conversations are used.