←back to thread

.NET 10

(devblogs.microsoft.com)
536 points runesoerensen | 1 comments | 11 Nov 25 15:44 UTC | HN request time: 0.212s | source
Show context
jitbit ◴[11 Nov 25 15:48 UTC] No.45888669[source]▶
For us, every .NET upgrade since .NET 5 has gone surprisingly smoothly and reduced CPU/RAM usage by 10–15%.

We were even able to downgrade our cloud servers to smaller instances, literally.

I wish .NET was more popular among startups, if only C# could get rid of the "enterpisey" stigma.

replies(28): >>45888799 #>>45888804 #>>45889332 #>>45891939 #>>45896032 #>>45898279 #>>45898305 #>>45898358 #>>45898503 #>>45898877 #>>45899062 #>>45899235 #>>45899246 #>>45899326 #>>45899445 #>>45899481 #>>45899858 #>>45900544 #>>45900791 #>>45900829 #>>45903218 #>>45904345 #>>45904435 #>>45905041 #>>45906073 #>>45907122 #>>45909149 #>>45909442 #
mbesto ◴[12 Nov 25 14:39 UTC] No.45900791[source]▶
> I wish .NET was more popular among startups

In my experience .NET/C# dwarfs pretty much any other framework in the SMB and there are WAY more software companies that aren't considered "startups" than those tagged as "startups".

replies(1): >>45904070 #
Lumping6371 ◴[12 Nov 25 18:41 UTC] No.45904070[source]▶
Yeah, but it's very likely you won't be working like a mule, or creating a bicycle with three wheels. How could oneself be innovative and top talent under such conditions?
replies(2): >>45908705 #>>45909721 #
1. mbesto ◴[13 Nov 25 00:05 UTC] No.45908705[source]▶
I've seen plenty of innovative .NET/C# shops. They just don't have the "hip" factor to them.