←back to thread

177 points pabs3 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.199s | source
Show context
karlkloss ◴[] No.45897158[source]
And when the AI bubble bursts, "refurbished" HDDs and GPUs will flood the market. Save your money now and be prepared.
replies(4): >>45897441 #>>45897779 #>>45899005 #>>45905947 #
Nux ◴[] No.45897779[source]
GPUs yes, but there'll be no HDDs making it alive, they'll get destroyed to protect whatever rubbish they had on.
replies(5): >>45898933 #>>45899550 #>>45902830 #>>45904076 #>>45909085 #
pmontra ◴[] No.45899550[source]
HDD can be written multiple times with random data if data centers really have to protect what their former customers wrote on them. I never looked at those details in standard contracts.

There is also encryption at rest.

replies(6): >>45899888 #>>45900464 #>>45903887 #>>45905249 #>>45908119 #>>45908151 #
SoftTalker ◴[] No.45905249[source]
All you really need to do is write one pass of zeros on them. That will prevent anyone but a very dedicated adversary with expensive equipment from recovering any data, especially on TB scale drives.

Can still take hours per drive though, which is why a lot of people skip it.

replies(2): >>45905700 #>>45907777 #
edoceo ◴[] No.45905700[source]
I make a random 1MB chunk, then write that all over the drive, at overlapping offsets. I've been told that really clears it. On IDE-spinning-rust disks I trusted it, not sure if I should trust these modern SSD
replies(1): >>45906905 #
p1mrx ◴[] No.45906905[source]
Why rewrite the same 1MB chunk, instead of making new random chunks?

Redundant data at least opens the possibility that the drive could deduplicate.

replies(1): >>45908677 #
1. edoceo ◴[] No.45908677[source]
Cause making new random was taking too much time.