←back to thread

.NET 10

(devblogs.microsoft.com)
536 points runesoerensen | 1 comments | 11 Nov 25 15:44 UTC | HN request time: 0.2s | source
Show context
jitbit ◴[11 Nov 25 15:48 UTC] No.45888669[source]▶
For us, every .NET upgrade since .NET 5 has gone surprisingly smoothly and reduced CPU/RAM usage by 10–15%.

We were even able to downgrade our cloud servers to smaller instances, literally.

I wish .NET was more popular among startups, if only C# could get rid of the "enterpisey" stigma.

replies(28): >>45888799 #>>45888804 #>>45889332 #>>45891939 #>>45896032 #>>45898279 #>>45898305 #>>45898358 #>>45898503 #>>45898877 #>>45899062 #>>45899235 #>>45899246 #>>45899326 #>>45899445 #>>45899481 #>>45899858 #>>45900544 #>>45900791 #>>45900829 #>>45903218 #>>45904345 #>>45904435 #>>45905041 #>>45906073 #>>45907122 #>>45909149 #>>45909442 #
christophilus ◴[12 Nov 25 12:28 UTC] No.45899326[source]▶
I really liked working with C#. I spent 15 years or so with it and found it very productive. But no; I don’t miss the culture of C# / Microsoft shops at all.
replies(1): >>45899411 #
mexicocitinluez ◴[12 Nov 25 12:37 UTC] No.45899411[source]▶
> culture of C# / Microsoft shops at al

What do you mean?

replies(3): >>45900142 #>>45900245 #>>45907847 #
1. omcnoe ◴[12 Nov 25 22:36 UTC] No.45907847[source]▶
My biggest complaint would be a tendency to blindly use a "Microsoft first" approach to selecting tech rather than evaluating things on their own merits in the context of their own use cases.

Some Microsoft stuff is really good but it's not universally true. And in the worst cases you end up locked into some hard to migrate off platform that is withering on the vine.