←back to thread

303 points nharada | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
mmmlinux ◴[] No.45902647[source]
I was in SF a few weekend ago and rode both Waymo and normal Lyft style taxi cars. the Waymo was a better experience in every single way. One of the Lyfts i was in drove on the shoulder for a while like it was a lane. The Waymos were just smooth consistent driving. No aggressive driving to get you dumped off so they can get to the next fair.
replies(13): >>45902760 #>>45902967 #>>45902998 #>>45903093 #>>45903449 #>>45904903 #>>45904913 #>>45905127 #>>45905613 #>>45906080 #>>45906696 #>>45908668 #>>45908990 #
LZ_Khan ◴[] No.45903093[source]
Waymo is overly conservative last time I checked. Driving the speed limit basically means getting to your destination twice as slow.
replies(5): >>45903135 #>>45903152 #>>45903168 #>>45903437 #>>45907764 #
Night_Thastus ◴[] No.45903437[source]
"Twice as slow" is not even slightly accurate.

If you're driving 45 in a 40, that may sound like 12% faster, but once you add traffic, lights, stop signs, turns, etc - you'll find that the 12% all but evaporates. Even if you're really pushing it and going 15 over, at most speeds and for most typical commutes, it saves very little.

Most of the time speeding ends up saving on the order of seconds on ~30 minutes or shorter trips.

Just about the only time it can be noticeable is if you're really pushing it (going to get pulled over speeds) on a nearly empty highway for a commute of 1.5+ hours.

replies(5): >>45904134 #>>45904563 #>>45904775 #>>45905543 #>>45907715 #
1. TulliusCicero ◴[] No.45907715[source]
Twice as slow was probably accurate when comparing Uber with freeways vs Waymo (which wasn't using freeways yet).

But now that Waymo is gonna use freeways, that major speed difference is gonna evaporate.