←back to thread

277 points nharada | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
mmmlinux ◴[] No.45902647[source]
I was in SF a few weekend ago and rode both Waymo and normal Lyft style taxi cars. the Waymo was a better experience in every single way. One of the Lyfts i was in drove on the shoulder for a while like it was a lane. The Waymos were just smooth consistent driving. No aggressive driving to get you dumped off so they can get to the next fair.
replies(11): >>45902760 #>>45902967 #>>45902998 #>>45903093 #>>45903449 #>>45904903 #>>45904913 #>>45905127 #>>45905613 #>>45906080 #>>45906696 #
prismatix ◴[] No.45902760[source]
I had a similar experience. A few months ago, I was in the city for a weekend and took Waymo for most of my rides. The one time I chose to use Lyft/Uber, the driver floored it before we even had a chance to shut the door or get buckled! The rest of the time we took Waymo.

I rarely use ride-sharing but other experiences include having been in a FSD Tesla Uber where the driver wasn't paying attention to the road the entire time (hands off the wheel, looking behind him, etc.).

I don't know if I trust Waymo cars with my life, but at least there are SOME standards, compared to the natural variance of humans.

replies(3): >>45902912 #>>45902913 #>>45907001 #
ericmcer ◴[] No.45902913[source]
It must be interesting being an Uber driver right now and literally watching the robots that will replace you driving around with you.

This has been a 15+ year process and will probably take a few more years. I don't feel too bad if they didn't manage to pivot in that time period.

replies(5): >>45903032 #>>45903124 #>>45903631 #>>45903674 #>>45904112 #
SirFatty ◴[] No.45903124[source]
"It must be interesting being an Uber driver right now and literally watching the robots that will replace you driving around with you."

You mean the way taxi drivers had to watch as Uber and Lyft replaced them?

replies(4): >>45903502 #>>45903521 #>>45903685 #>>45904312 #
ang_cire ◴[] No.45904312[source]
It's funny how "exploit workers worse (medallions) and worse (rideshares) until we can fully cut them out" has played out in such a perfect microcosm, and yet somehow people here don't seem to register that it was never the workers' own fault.

Taxis didn't lose because rideshares played the game better, they lost because rideshare companies used investor money to leapfrog their apps, ignored actual commercial transport regulations that would have made them DOA, and then exploited workers by claiming they weren't even employees, all so they could artificially undercut taxis to kill them off and capture the market before enshittifying.

replies(4): >>45904477 #>>45905148 #>>45905246 #>>45907582 #
nradov ◴[] No.45905246[source]
Taxis lost at least partly because the workers were assholes. Refusing to take credit card payments (the card reader is "broken") or not picking up members of certain ethnic groups or not driving to certain areas. Sure some cabbies were nice, honest people with good customer service skills but those were the exception in many cities.

There was nothing stopping taxi companies from raising investor capital to build better apps and back end technology infrastructure. They were just lazy and incompetent.

replies(1): >>45905443 #
1. SoftTalker ◴[] No.45905443[source]
> some cabbies were nice, honest people

Most were, in fact. You just remember the assholes a lot more.