←back to thread

.NET 10

(devblogs.microsoft.com)
489 points runesoerensen | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
jitbit ◴[] No.45888669[source]
For us, every .NET upgrade since .NET 5 has gone surprisingly smoothly and reduced CPU/RAM usage by 10–15%.

We were even able to downgrade our cloud servers to smaller instances, literally.

I wish .NET was more popular among startups, if only C# could get rid of the "enterpisey" stigma.

replies(26): >>45888799 #>>45888804 #>>45889332 #>>45891939 #>>45896032 #>>45898279 #>>45898305 #>>45898358 #>>45898503 #>>45898877 #>>45899062 #>>45899235 #>>45899246 #>>45899326 #>>45899445 #>>45899481 #>>45899858 #>>45900544 #>>45900791 #>>45900829 #>>45903218 #>>45904345 #>>45904435 #>>45905041 #>>45906073 #>>45907122 #
parliament32 ◴[] No.45899481[source]
I think the key problem is that a large number of startups are shipping software in containers, and dotnet requiring a CLR is not particularly well-suited for containerization. It's like the old school Java JVM model. You have to ship a copy of the runtime with every container, and if you're doing proper microservices it's an awful lot of overhead.

Yes I'm aware MS makes it easy to build containers and even single executables, but languages that compile down to an ELF are pretty much a requirement once your deployments are over the 10k containers mark.

replies(11): >>45899527 #>>45900963 #>>45901005 #>>45901024 #>>45901026 #>>45901133 #>>45901711 #>>45901752 #>>45903133 #>>45904968 #>>45905736 #
greener_grass ◴[] No.45901024[source]
> dotnet requiring a CLR is not particularly well-suited for containerization

Why? I routinely put compiled .NET programs into containers.

It's also easy (easier than Rust even) to build on Mac targeting a Linux image.

replies(1): >>45903072 #
parliament32 ◴[] No.45903072[source]
Create a hello world dotnet container, then do the same in a modern language. Then compare image size and resource consumption. Then imagine you're running tens of thousands of containers in a proper SaaS microservices model, and it'll make sense :)
replies(4): >>45904938 #>>45905036 #>>45905694 #>>45906163 #
1. maximilianburke ◴[] No.45904938[source]
Sounds like a problem with the "proper SaaS microservices model" more than .NET