←back to thread

281 points nharada | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
mmmlinux ◴[] No.45902647[source]
I was in SF a few weekend ago and rode both Waymo and normal Lyft style taxi cars. the Waymo was a better experience in every single way. One of the Lyfts i was in drove on the shoulder for a while like it was a lane. The Waymos were just smooth consistent driving. No aggressive driving to get you dumped off so they can get to the next fair.
replies(12): >>45902760 #>>45902967 #>>45902998 #>>45903093 #>>45903449 #>>45904903 #>>45904913 #>>45905127 #>>45905613 #>>45906080 #>>45906696 #>>45908668 #
toast0 ◴[] No.45902998[source]
> Waymo was a better experience in every single way. One of the Lyfts i was in drove on the shoulder for a while like it was a lane.

These sentances conflict. I recently took a taxi from JFK to Manhattan during rush hour, and I estimate if the driver didn't use all of the paved surface, it would have taken at least 10 more minutes to arrive. (And it wouldn't have been an authentic NYC experience)

It's ok if you prefer the Waymo experience, and if you find it a better experience overall, but if a human driver saves you time, the Waymo wasn't better in every single way.

I am assuming the Lyft driver used the shoulder effectively. My experience with Lyft+Uber has been hit or miss... Some drivers are like traditional taxi drivers: it's an exciting ride because the driver knows the capabilities of their vehicle and uses them and they navigate obstacles within inches; some drivers are the opposite, it's an exciting ride because it feels like Star Tours (is this your first time? well, it's mine too) and they're using your ride to find the capabilities of their vehicle. The first type of driver is likely to use the shoulder effectively, and the second not so much.

replies(5): >>45903048 #>>45903050 #>>45903077 #>>45903097 #>>45903355 #
QuercusMax ◴[] No.45903048[source]
You want your cab driver to drive on the shoulder and break the law? What?
replies(1): >>45903123 #
CPLX ◴[] No.45903123[source]
You may want to become aware of the existence of New York City. It's a pretty interesting place.
replies(1): >>45903167 #
QuercusMax ◴[] No.45903167[source]
Yeah, that sounds like NYC nonsense. I assume it's still illegal to drive on the shoulder in New York.
replies(1): >>45903250 #
CPLX ◴[] No.45903250[source]
Perhaps. But if you have a taxi or car service driver who's not willing to ever break any traffic laws in New York, you will not arrive at your destination in anything approaching a reasonable amount of time.

For example, getting at the back of the line for an exit rather than trying to go to the front and cut your way in could be a multi-hour mistake.

replies(4): >>45903476 #>>45903522 #>>45903543 #>>45903627 #
1. dboreham ◴[] No.45903627[source]
Apart from not having to deal with a human, observance of traffic laws is the main advantage I see in autonomous vehicles. Once there are a decent proportion of them on the road we can ratchet up penalties against human asshole drivers, conviction aided by evidence gathered by the sensors on the surrounding non-human vehicles.