←back to thread

281 points nharada | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
NullHypothesist ◴[] No.45902077[source]
This is a huge sign of confidence that they think they can do this safely and at scale... Freeways might appear "easy" on the surface, but there are all sorts of long tail edge-cases that make them insanely tricky to do confidently without a driver. This will unlock a lot for them with all of the smaller US cities (where highways are essential) they've announced plans for over the next year or so.
replies(11): >>45902083 #>>45902240 #>>45902312 #>>45902557 #>>45902757 #>>45902766 #>>45902824 #>>45902829 #>>45903817 #>>45904393 #>>45904891 #
ddp26 ◴[] No.45902824[source]
I agree, but it's funny to think that Project Chauffeur (as it was known then) was doing completely driverless freeway circuits in the bay area as far back as 2012! Back when they couldn't do the simplest things with traffic lights.

I think anyone back then would be totally shocked that urban and suburban driving launched to the public before freeway driving.

replies(2): >>45903158 #>>45903474 #
1. philistine ◴[] No.45903474[source]
If you understand physics, it's easy. When you double the speed, you quadruple the kinetic energy. So you're definitely going to do slower speeds first, even if it's harder to compute.