(devblogs.microsoft.com)

489 points runesoerensen | 1 comments | 11 Nov 25 15:44 UTC | HN request time: 0.288s | source

Show context

jitbit ◴[11 Nov 25 15:48 UTC] No.45888669[source]▶

For us, every .NET upgrade since .NET 5 has gone surprisingly smoothly and reduced CPU/RAM usage by 10–15%.

We were even able to downgrade our cloud servers to smaller instances, literally.

I wish .NET was more popular among startups, if only C# could get rid of the "enterpisey" stigma.

replies(26): >>45888799 #>>45888804 #>>45889332 #>>45891939 #>>45896032 #>>45898279 #>>45898305 #>>45898358 #>>45898503 #>>45898877 #>>45899062 #>>45899235 #>>45899246 #>>45899326 #>>45899445 #>>45899481 #>>45899858 #>>45900544 #>>45900791 #>>45900829 #>>45903218 #>>45904345 #>>45904435 #>>45905041 #>>45906073 #>>45907122 #

olavgg ◴[12 Nov 25 09:57 UTC] No.45898305[source]▶

>>45888669 #

As a startup, what is it in for me to switch from Java, Spring Boot, Hibernate, Beam, Flink, Pulsar, Vault, KeyCloak ecosystem to C#.Net? Is the documentation better? Do I get better performance? Is the community larger and more stable?

replies(4): >>45898404 #>>45898520 #>>45899801 #>>45900264 #

1. griffiths ◴[12 Nov 25 14:00 UTC] No.45900264[source]▶

>>45898305 #

As others have mentioned Vault, Keycloak, Flink are language agnostic. Regarding the switch from Java to .NET, I would rather recommend switching to Kotlin instead of .NET for a developer experience similar to C#, while still keeping your existing expertise in Java and its ecosystem. And this comes from someone in a .NET shop currently, but have worked with Java before. IMHO both languages and surrounding ecosystems are good. Both have their pros and cons and quirks.

↑

.NET 10