←back to thread

.NET 10

(devblogs.microsoft.com)
489 points runesoerensen | 1 comments | 11 Nov 25 15:44 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
jitbit ◴[11 Nov 25 15:48 UTC] No.45888669[source]▶
For us, every .NET upgrade since .NET 5 has gone surprisingly smoothly and reduced CPU/RAM usage by 10–15%.

We were even able to downgrade our cloud servers to smaller instances, literally.

I wish .NET was more popular among startups, if only C# could get rid of the "enterpisey" stigma.

replies(26): >>45888799 #>>45888804 #>>45889332 #>>45891939 #>>45896032 #>>45898279 #>>45898305 #>>45898358 #>>45898503 #>>45898877 #>>45899062 #>>45899235 #>>45899246 #>>45899326 #>>45899445 #>>45899481 #>>45899858 #>>45900544 #>>45900791 #>>45900829 #>>45903218 #>>45904345 #>>45904435 #>>45905041 #>>45906073 #>>45907122 #
catlover76 ◴[11 Nov 25 15:57 UTC] No.45888804[source]▶
> I wish .NET was more popular among startups, if only C# could get rid of the "enterpisey" stigma.

There's that, but there's also the developer experience and functionality for people to run it on Mac and Linux.

We have a small C# service that we run locally via Docker (which I think is usually the optimal setup anyways) and develop with VSCode. Since it's small, it has worked well. Would it work well if that was our main backend? Not sure.

Wish I had the option of full Visual Studio on Mac for it regardless.

replies(6): >>45889972 #>>45890682 #>>45891057 #>>45892093 #>>45898134 #>>45901137 #
phillipcarter ◴[11 Nov 25 18:05 UTC] No.45890682[source]▶
Rider is your option there, it's better than Visual Studio (I used to work on VS).
replies(2): >>45898213 #>>45898330 #
starvar ◴[12 Nov 25 09:43 UTC] No.45898213[source]▶
How is it so different than Visual Studio that you think it is "better"?
replies(6): >>45898247 #>>45898249 #>>45898322 #>>45898354 #>>45898716 #>>45899595 #
1. zigzag312 ◴[12 Nov 25 12:59 UTC] No.45899595[source]▶
Much better UX and integrated ReSharper.