←back to thread

.NET 10

(devblogs.microsoft.com)
489 points runesoerensen | 1 comments | 11 Nov 25 15:44 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
jitbit ◴[11 Nov 25 15:48 UTC] No.45888669[source]▶
For us, every .NET upgrade since .NET 5 has gone surprisingly smoothly and reduced CPU/RAM usage by 10–15%.

We were even able to downgrade our cloud servers to smaller instances, literally.

I wish .NET was more popular among startups, if only C# could get rid of the "enterpisey" stigma.

replies(26): >>45888799 #>>45888804 #>>45889332 #>>45891939 #>>45896032 #>>45898279 #>>45898305 #>>45898358 #>>45898503 #>>45898877 #>>45899062 #>>45899235 #>>45899246 #>>45899326 #>>45899445 #>>45899481 #>>45899858 #>>45900544 #>>45900791 #>>45900829 #>>45903218 #>>45904345 #>>45904435 #>>45905041 #>>45906073 #>>45907122 #
catlover76 ◴[11 Nov 25 15:57 UTC] No.45888804[source]▶
> I wish .NET was more popular among startups, if only C# could get rid of the "enterpisey" stigma.

There's that, but there's also the developer experience and functionality for people to run it on Mac and Linux.

We have a small C# service that we run locally via Docker (which I think is usually the optimal setup anyways) and develop with VSCode. Since it's small, it has worked well. Would it work well if that was our main backend? Not sure.

Wish I had the option of full Visual Studio on Mac for it regardless.

replies(6): >>45889972 #>>45890682 #>>45891057 #>>45892093 #>>45898134 #>>45901137 #
phillipcarter ◴[11 Nov 25 18:05 UTC] No.45890682[source]▶
Rider is your option there, it's better than Visual Studio (I used to work on VS).
replies(2): >>45898213 #>>45898330 #
starvar ◴[12 Nov 25 09:43 UTC] No.45898213[source]▶
How is it so different than Visual Studio that you think it is "better"?
replies(6): >>45898247 #>>45898249 #>>45898322 #>>45898354 #>>45898716 #>>45899595 #
SparkBomb ◴[12 Nov 25 11:04 UTC] No.45898716[source]▶
I've used Rider for several years now on and off. Generally I would put these at the top of the list.

- Integrated ReSharper.

- Far better performance (it isn't even close)

- Doesn't take 30GB of disc space up. Visual Studio has been a massive disc space hog since forever. Rider is a few hundred megabytes IIRC.

- Less bugs (Visual Studio has been progressively getting worse).

- There was better tooling IMO around NuGET.

replies(1): >>45898954 #
dahauns ◴[12 Nov 25 11:41 UTC] No.45898954{3}[source]▶
>- Less bugs (Visual Studio has been progressively getting worse).

Eeeeeeh...it's not quite roses and rainbows on the Rider side either, and that's coming from a Jetbrains fanboy. (Although admittedly, I'm not really up-to-date on the current state of VS in day-to-day work)

But yeah, the coding/refactoring support (Resharper et al) and general quality and integration of tooling (database tools, package managers, version control, debugging (esp. multi-process) etc.) is the big one for me.

replies(1): >>45899168 #
1. SparkBomb ◴[12 Nov 25 12:07 UTC] No.45899168{4}[source]▶
> Eeeeeeh...it's not quite roses and rainbows on the Rider side either, and that's coming from a Jetbrains fanboy

Obviously. IME it is better than Visual Studio.

> But yeah, the coding/refactoring support (Resharper et al) and general quality and integration of tooling (database tools, package managers, version control, debugging (esp. multi-process) etc.) is the big one for me.

I rarely use any of these tools tbh. I just want Resharper and something that works reliably on Linux. I would transition to using vim entirely but half the vim stuff I like using I can't use with Windows (work is never not going to use Windows).