←back to thread

.NET 10

(devblogs.microsoft.com)
489 points runesoerensen | 2 comments | 11 Nov 25 15:44 UTC | HN request time: 0.422s | source
Show context
jitbit ◴[11 Nov 25 15:48 UTC] No.45888669[source]▶
For us, every .NET upgrade since .NET 5 has gone surprisingly smoothly and reduced CPU/RAM usage by 10–15%.

We were even able to downgrade our cloud servers to smaller instances, literally.

I wish .NET was more popular among startups, if only C# could get rid of the "enterpisey" stigma.

replies(26): >>45888799 #>>45888804 #>>45889332 #>>45891939 #>>45896032 #>>45898279 #>>45898305 #>>45898358 #>>45898503 #>>45898877 #>>45899062 #>>45899235 #>>45899246 #>>45899326 #>>45899445 #>>45899481 #>>45899858 #>>45900544 #>>45900791 #>>45900829 #>>45903218 #>>45904345 #>>45904435 #>>45905041 #>>45906073 #>>45907122 #
1. jgilias ◴[12 Nov 25 10:06 UTC] No.45898358[source]▶
Startups typically have the tech stack that the one man army tech co-founder set up on no budget. Apparently then .NET isn’t too popular for that!
replies(1): >>45904950 #
2. thewebguyd ◴[12 Nov 25 19:25 UTC] No.45904950[source]▶
That's part of it, but is also weird because C# & .NET is probably one of the most productive single-developer stack you can choose. Modern ASP.NET handles so much for you it's a lot like Rails in that regard, you can get a lot done in it solo.