←back to thread

.NET 10

(devblogs.microsoft.com)
489 points runesoerensen | 1 comments | 11 Nov 25 15:44 UTC | HN request time: 0.258s | source
Show context
jitbit ◴[11 Nov 25 15:48 UTC] No.45888669[source]▶
For us, every .NET upgrade since .NET 5 has gone surprisingly smoothly and reduced CPU/RAM usage by 10–15%.

We were even able to downgrade our cloud servers to smaller instances, literally.

I wish .NET was more popular among startups, if only C# could get rid of the "enterpisey" stigma.

replies(26): >>45888799 #>>45888804 #>>45889332 #>>45891939 #>>45896032 #>>45898279 #>>45898305 #>>45898358 #>>45898503 #>>45898877 #>>45899062 #>>45899235 #>>45899246 #>>45899326 #>>45899445 #>>45899481 #>>45899858 #>>45900544 #>>45900791 #>>45900829 #>>45903218 #>>45904345 #>>45904435 #>>45905041 #>>45906073 #>>45907122 #
randyburden ◴[12 Nov 25 03:15 UTC] No.45896032[source]▶
For what it's worth, the startup I currently work for is built entirely in C# and .NET, as was my previous employer. Both startups are based in the Dallas, TX area. Across both companies, applications were hosted on Azure and AWS using a mix of PaaS services and virtual machines running Windows and Linux. We've consistently found this stack to enable strong productivity and high-velocity release cadences.
replies(2): >>45898225 #>>45898329 #
1. DeathArrow ◴[12 Nov 25 09:44 UTC] No.45898225[source]▶
At my current workplace we use a mix of on premise servers and Azure but at former workplaces we deployed to Google Cloud and AWS.