←back to thread

64 points mrtesthah | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.328s | source
Show context
chasd00 ◴[] No.45813489[source]
Read the article and then you'll put away your pitchforks. A basic rule is snap recipients can't be treated differently than non-program members which seems reasonable.

"At issue is SNAP’s “Equal Treatment Rule,” which bars stores from either discriminating against people in the program or offering them favorable treatment. "

replies(7): >>45813511 #>>45813542 #>>45813597 #>>45813721 #>>45813753 #>>45814104 #>>45815963 #
pseudalopex ◴[] No.45813542[source]
Forbidding charging SNAP recipients more is reasonable. Why is it reasonable to forbid charging SNAP recipients less?
replies(7): >>45813637 #>>45813727 #>>45813842 #>>45813930 #>>45813946 #>>45814869 #>>45815301 #
Steven420 ◴[] No.45814869[source]
People that don't work should not get preferential treatment over people that actually contribute to the economy. Many people that need food stamps are just temporarily in a bad position but many are just taking advantage
replies(2): >>45815101 #>>45815821 #
1. FireBeyond ◴[] No.45815821[source]
Who are you to tell another person or business that they can't give people in a bad position a little help?

I'm sure you equally complain when some businesses over food or drinks to the homeless too.