←back to thread

111 points rabinovich | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
nalak ◴[] No.45813277[source]
AI why? Where’s the proof that AI was involved in this?
replies(2): >>45813329 #>>45813944 #
rabinovich ◴[] No.45813329[source]
"A popular tech YouTuber with over 350,000 subscribers has lost his channel after YouTube’s automated systems flagged him for an alleged connection to a completely unrelated Japanese channel that received copyright strikes."
replies(2): >>45813412 #>>45813426 #
echelon ◴[] No.45813426[source]
That's not necessarily AI.

That could be as simple as a database lookup against flagged accounts or a simple heuristic score.

We're over-AI-ing everything.

replies(4): >>45813465 #>>45813466 #>>45813532 #>>45813818 #
t-writescode ◴[] No.45813532[source]
Wouldn’t a heuristic score be AI? It could very probably *not* be an LLM or Stable Diffusion or similar which has coopted the overall term “AI”; but that doesn’t make it not an expert system, or an SLM used for categorization, or even A* search, all of which fell under the umbrella of “AI” for a long time.
replies(2): >>45814683 #>>45815321 #
1. danaris ◴[] No.45815321[source]
I assure you, they still do.

Artificial Intelligence is a thriving and active discipline of the Computer Science field.

It includes things like A* search and expert systems even now, despite current popular parlance shoving LLMs into the spotlight as "AI" and implying that that's all the term means.